Release Management/PerformanceTest
Contents |
Work flow
2.40
Below is a workflow that is used to test performance in Openbravo ERP 2.40. This will be used as base to decide the flow for 2.50
Flow 1: | Startpage + login |
Flow 2: | Startpage + login + create a product |
Flow 3: | Startpage + login + Search a product |
Flow 4: | Startpage + login + Search a bpartner + switch to grid |
Flow 5: | Startpage + login + Search a bpartner |
Flow 6: | Startpage + login + bp + search popup,cancel + enter bp with customer & location, go back to bp tab |
Flow 7: | Startpage + login + BP + goto Grid + toolbar next + toolbar last |
Flow 8: | Login - Create a sales order |
Flow 9: | Startpage + login + Sales order + Search one documentno + OK |
Flow 10: | Login + Create a sales invoice |
Flow 11: | Startpage + login + Sales invoice + SearchPopup + Search one,ok + Display one line in Grid + change to EditView |
Flow 12: | Startpage + login + Sales invoice + Search 100000 + Payment tab + goto form view |
Flow 13: | Search a bankstatement |
Flow 14: | Search a settlement |
Flow 15: | See the account tree |
Flow 16: | See the Account selector |
Flow 17: | See the business partner selector |
2.50
We can perhaps reuse the test that is written for 2.40. Regarding this we have discussed with stefan from platform and below is the what he had to say. Now we need to decide what are the next steps.
Stefan Huehner input
Note that test 9 is broken and thus not used so far (just deactivated and ignored in our measurements)). From functional point of you our Pablo's could perhaps comment. My two cents: - Remove Flow 15 as the speciality of the account tree is the tree display which is done by the browser so not directly covered by the perf tests, from the server's point of view the Account tree is just another normal genereated window. - Perhaps remove flow 17 as using the business partner selector is only a sub-step of creating an order (or an invoice) - Perhaps unify Flow4 and Flow5 (remove 5) as they also overlap. - Check with ob-xpress so that we get a good coverage of the flow in this?