View source | View content page | Page history | Printable version   

Talk:Projects/Ecommerce Integration/FunctionalSpecifications

Comments on the version from July 9th, 2008

The suggested approach in the document is probably correct but it is very difficult to assess that and to read it. It looks like you are jumping to conclusions without having done the analysis (I'm sure you have done it but it is not in the document, or at least it is not easily understandable).

I would ask you to be as consistent as possible to the standard functional specification template. You can see [1] as an example. In particular the functional requirements section is the most important one and I would suggest to populate it as follows:

More on a formal perspective:


[1] [2]

Hello Paolo,

Thanks for your comments and suggestion. I have just updated the specification to reflect these.



--Jordimas 17:50, 5 August 2008 (CEST)

Retrieved from ""

This page has been accessed 1,427 times. This page was last modified on 5 August 2008, at 15:50. Content is available under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Spain License.